POETRY – enjoyed by few (2)

Such has been the response to the original post, that rather than respond to each comment, I’ve written another post bringing in other poets varied and valid takes on this subject in order to make their views more accessible to all.

Nandita felt that to appreciate poetry you need to have a heightened sense of perception and depth of understanding that is not usually necessary for say, a popular novel, and that the attraction of this form of writing is just that, it’s easy, the reader is in a sense spoon fed.   This struck a chord with me. My wife, who has a law degree, and her close friends who are all university educated have a penchant for popular novels, (my wife loves ‘B’ movies too !) but literally curl their nose up at poetry . They use a telling phrase in light of Nandita’s comment ‘I just don’t get it’. The speed at which they go through novels of this kind is astounding and when I tease them in good natured banter over their preference for such literature and their dislike of poetry they defend their choice by saying ‘it’s escapism’. I get their meaning but is not any enjoyable activity ‘escapism’, a means to rest body and mind from the toils and troubles of life? There are of course novels that demand more of their readers such as Kafka’s ‘The Trial’ or Orwell’s ‘Animal farm’. Yet even these novels, do not have, as Nandita says the nuances and literary complexities of most poems.                                                                                                                                             For most people then, poetry is just too demanding and therefore ceases to become pleasurable. I guess it may be also related to personality types. Going back to the ‘escapism’ tag, I’ve always relaxed by seeking knowledge, learning, stimulating my mind to escape, as opposed to shutting it down. Whilst reading in bed together my wife, she would be reading the latest Dan Brown novel and I the history of the Jacobite revolts 1715-45 !   Horses for courses, each to his own,

Lynn made the valid comment, which branches from the above, that a great deal of people say they don’t have the time to read and/or interest. This is significant, and could account for the popularity of mass market novels. They are bought on a whim, and ‘dipped’ into now and then, scanned rather than read, because really, there is little more interest in them than in poetry. Lynn also draws and paints and commented that she feels that this and her writing come from two different places. Lynn’s take marries in with both the original post and the paragraphs above.

Miriam took things in a different direction . I agree whole heartedly when she asks ‘should we be the tools to awaken the emotional intelligence in others’ . My view is, that is what a poem should do, ‘awaken !’ not just emotional intelligence, though can there be a more worthy goal, but intelligence and imagination as well. Miriam also made the comment that she ‘feels images’ as she reads . I myself would describe it in this way. I experience at times a heightening of senses, where intuition is spot on, I feel euphoric, and the world is vivid and everything wondrous. There are certain circumstances that facilitate this ‘switch throwing’, reading poetry is just one. ( The downside is I can be awake for days ).

Roland took a similar view to Nandita. Roland says he agrees that poetry’s appeal is limited by its use of language but also by the need to interpret that language. Very often we have to delve deeply into the words and struggle to get at the meaning and emotions behind them. He goes on to say that we then make judgement, rightly or wrongly, on its worth and value to us as individuals. That again may be it in a nutshell, for most people it has little worth and value as they get nothing for it.

Davy has brought yet a different angle to the debate . Picking up on academia and the publishing world . Davy says he wonders if it is something to do with poetry being hijacked by academia and publishing houses who only publish poets who can access and write their code. Davy has a point, both these institutions are understandably self-serving and therefore must surely be driving the poetry that is available. And of course the less that is available, the less exposure, less public awareness, less sales and round again in a self-fulfilling cycle.

I think things are changing, there was a recent series of ads featuring poetry readings and John Cooper Clarke has been on a quiz show and I know of a few brilliant, undiscovered, poets around the world !

Thank you for reading/commenting .

6 thoughts on “POETRY – enjoyed by few (2)

  1. A good summary Nigel and I think there are lots of separate conversations in there worth visiting throughout the year. I went to bed last night thinking about the link between poetry and personality. Does our personality influence whether we will take to poetry or not and even the style of poetry we choose to like or write. This has got my head spinning and feels like I could write a thesis on it about getting to the heart of poetry. I laughed about you and your wife in bed as it must be a situation for many poets. I was in bed last night reading a book about the History of Fonts and Type while the wife was reading something much easier on the brain. Do you think your love of poetry is linked to the problem solving nature of the brain?

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Absolutely Davy, I’m very much an ideas man, nothing is unsolvable, I picture the problem as a set of images in my mind, then forget it, just before sleep. 9/10 I wake up with the answer. BUT I can’t draw a straight line with a ruler or fold a paper to fit neatly in an envelope.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Can’t believe I had missed this, Nigel, please forgive me. Firstly, thank you for the mention. And yes, following up on my earlier argument, another reason poetry has fewer readership is the usage of metaphors and the devices we use to convey an emotion. Let’s take unrequited love for instance. If I were reading a novel, I would most probably read “and she would never know how much it hurt me to see her with her lover”. Now, I would convey the very same emotion in poetry this way:
    the dawn I sought never kissed my dusk”

    In a similar vein, a book would describe a love story in a very matter of fact way, whereas I would (poets for that matter would) say:
    love is what makes stars seem brighter, poetry is witnessing that on paper.

    Barring a few truly exceptional novelists, prose can’t really do to you what poetry can, i.e. invoke and stimulate your senses sometimes all at once if the imagery is such. Poetry is synesthetic, don’t you think?

    As far as languages are concerned, I will have to frame my argument before I can put in in black and white here. And here, that is exactly what I mean, poetry does not involve “thinking” mostly, all it takes is “feeling”. Head versus heart is what prose versus poetry is all about, as far as I see it.
    P. S. Sorry, it turned out to be long.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s